WebRUTHERFORD v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEX. Email Print Comments (0) No. 98-20623. View Case Cited Cases Citing Case Cited Cases Listed below are the cases that are cited in this … WebDec 21, 2000 · Case opinion for US 5th Circuit SIMI INVESTMENT COMPANY INC v. HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... See Rutherford v. Harris County, Tex., 197 F.3d 173, 189-90 (5th Cir.1999); Taylor-Callahan-Coleman Counties v. ... County of Harris, a Texas Court of Civil Appeals case that decided an earlier dispute …
AUTOZONE, INC. v. SALVADOR REYES--Appeal from 197th District Court …
WebTo establish a prima facie disparate treatment case, a plaintiff must show: (1) she is a member of a protected class, (2) she was qualified for her position, (3) she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) others similarly situated were more favorably treated. Rutherford v. Harris County, Tex., 197 F.3d 173, 184 (5th Cir. 1999). WebSep 8, 2024 · THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF . Plaintiff, § § v. § § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § CHRIS HOLLINS, in his official capacity § as Harris County Clerk § Defendant. § 127th JUDICIAL DISTRICT. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TEXAS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CHRIS HOLLINS bulk hdd purchase
RUTHERFORD v. HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS (1999) FindLaw
WebHarris County argued at trial that it promoted Green rather than Rutherford because he was better qualified. 9 It posited that Rutherford's spotty job performance as a temporary … WebMar 15, 2000 · Appellants Joseph K. McGowen ("McGowen") and Harris County, Texas ("the County") appeal from a jury verdict holding them liable for the wrongful death of Susan Harrison White ("White") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The district court, giving preclusive effect to McGowen's Texas state criminal conviction for murder, forbade McGowen to … WebJustice, First Court of Appeals, Texas (Ret.): 2001 - 2024 . Harris County Assistant District Attorney (Houston): 1990 – 2000 . ... This Rule also provides that “the appellate court may decide the case before a reply brief is filed.” T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.3. This suggests that the court’s consideration of a reply brief is not a matter of hair extension headband halo